Drawing for WILLA

USPTO serial 77266055

WILLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn L. Phillips

Robyn L. Phillips WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 East South Temple, Ste. 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings featuring family and individual building tools; Children's educational music CDs and DVDs; Digital media, namely, CDs, DVDs, and downloadable audio and video files featuring family and individual building tools; Motion picture films about family training and self-improvement; Prerecorded video cassettes featuring family and individual building toolsACTIVE—
016Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials in the field of family training and self-improvement; Pictures; Paintings; Greeting cardsACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the InternetACTIVE—
041Instruction in the field of family training and self-improvement; Education services, namely, providing classes, workshops, and seminars in the field of family training and self-improvement; Production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring family and individual building toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 5, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 24, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 24, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance