Drawing for STEAM N' MASH

USPTO serial 77266087

STEAM N' MASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEAM N' MASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed potatoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 15, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 4, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 31, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 20, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 18, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 18, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance