USPTO serial 77266927
RULES FOR RENEGADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RULES FOR RENEGADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Leffler
DAVID LEFFLER LEFFLER MARCUS & MCCAFFREY LLC200 MADISON AVE STE 1901NEW YORK, NY 10016-4001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | A series of books, written articles, manuals and newsletters featuring information on starting new businesses, business entrepreneurship, developing and executing business plans, hiring employees and advisors, identifying and obtaining financial backing, overcoming obstacles in growing a business, developing new products and services and public relations for businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting and information services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars in the fields of starting new businesses, business entrepreneurship, developing and executing business plans, hiring employees and advisors, identifying and obtaining financial backing, overcoming obstacles in growing a business, developing new products and services, public relations for businesses, and distributing course materials in the nature of books, manuals and newsletters therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mighty Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mighty Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RULES FOR RENEGADES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |