Drawing for SYMON@RETAIL

USPTO serial 77266986

SYMON@RETAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYMON@RETAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Verret

VALERIE VERRET BAKER BOTTS LLPSTE 6002001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for programming content for broadcast to visual display units, namely, streaming video, current event content, live news, weather and other data feeds for any business or commercial user to display information and content to its customers in the end users surroundingsACTIVE—
038Subscription broadcasting via a TCP/IP network to visual display units of a customizable media information package; subscription broadcasting via a TCP/IP network to visual display units of information obtained directly from subscriber, including daily specials, financial information, employee communications, current events, and other information relative to subscriberACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance