USPTO serial 77267071
MICROGEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROGEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Michael Brucker
H. MICHAEL BRUCKER H. MICHAEL BRUCKER LAW CORP.5855 DOYLE ST STE 110EMERYVILLE, CA 94608-2533UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer diagnostic services; computer project management services; computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; information technology consultation; computer virus protection services; leasing of computers; consultation services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; consultation services in the field of information technology systems, namely, acquisition, implementation, maintenance and training in the use of computer-based information systems, auditing security of computer-based information technology systems comprising computers, computer networks and peripherals, implementing security solutions for computer-based information systems, namely, end point security, transit security, intrusion detection and prevention, firewalls and network access control; consultation services in the field of information technology systems, namely, computer network application acceleration, load balancing, server consolidation, server virtualization, WAN optimization, HPC environments, routing/switching network design and implementation and management solutions; consultation services in the field of information technology storage systems, namely, acquisition, implementation and maintenance of digital information storage solutions, namely, direct attached storage, network attached storage, storage area networks, business continuity solutions and replication solutions; consultation services in the field of information technology hardware and software infrastructure (computers, computer networks and peripherals) management; consultation services in the field of document output management; and consultation services in the field of information technology document management, namely, digitizing, imaging, organizing, storing, searching and protecting documents | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |