Drawing for CA CROSSING AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 77267726

CA CROSSING AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CA CROSSING AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy E. Don

STACY E. DON ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLPIP PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT4 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machinery for manufacturing computer chips and processing wafersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 14, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 13, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance