USPTO serial 77267889
GREENWICH AEROGROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3411179Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREENWICH AEROGROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith Sapp
Judith Sapp KOMONDOROK LLC111 WEST STPORTLAND, ME 04102-3416UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services, namely, aircraft management for others; Distributorships in the field of aircraft and structural and replacement parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 036 | Aircraft brokerage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 037 | Aircraft repair and maintenance; Outer and inner cleaning of aircraft;Airplane deicing services; Avionics installation and repair; Fueling services for aircraft; Technical support services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of aircraft engine and repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 039 | Airplane chartering; Airport services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 042 | Engineering services, namely, engineering for the field of aviation and avionics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 043 | Catering for the provision of food and beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Greenwich AeroGroup, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Greenwich AeroGroup, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GREENWICH AEROGROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |