USPTO serial 77267971
DIVINITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIVINITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sultanpur, New Delhi, IN
Sultanpur, New Delhi, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
Lisa M. DuRoss HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.P.O. BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Pendants; jewelry; jewelry constructed from gold and gold plated foils; precious metal, namely, gold in foil form featuring etched images; stamped foils of precious metal; precious metal, namely, gold in foil form | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Electronic commerce services, namely, providing information about products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; online retail store services featuring giftware, namely, religious games, devotional rosaries, devotional boxes, advent sets, baptismal products, children's products, communion products, books, bibles, stationary, figurines, plaques, candle holders, pins, cross, crucifixes, bells, mugs, keychains, prayer cards, holy water, wall rosaries, metal engravings, scapulars, pictures and photos, toys, bracelets, candles, car visor clips, rearview hangings, music, rosary cases, knockers, magnets, mass kits, medals, night lights, T-shirts, clocks, religious porcelain bell set, bookmarks, multimedia CD-ROMs, videos and vcds, banners and flags, wall hangings, Pope John Paul II, pyx, rings, stations of the cross, water fronts, Christian jewelry, devotional oil paintings; advertising; advertising, namely, providing advertising space on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taneja Mines Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Taneja Mines Private Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DIVINITI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |