CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EMPOWHER HEALTHY WOMEN HEALTHY CHOICES

USPTO serial 77268299

EMPOWHER HEALTHY WOMEN HEALTHY CHOICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMPOWHER HEALTHY WOMEN HEALTHY CHOICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan F. Ariano

JONATHAN F. ARIANO OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.2929 N CENTRAL AVE STE 2100PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2793UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing on-line discussion forums, chat rooms and bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning health and medical information, personal experiences, advice, encouragement, inspiration and other messages in the field of general interest by and among website usersACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, hosting on-line interactive public calendars that allow multiple participants to share health-related event schedulesACTIVE—
044Providing a website for women featuring information in the fields of women's health, nutrition, well-being, diet planning, healthcare, traditional and alternative medicine, diseases and disease awareness, symptoms, treatment, management and preventionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance