USPTO serial 77268909
MYLIFELOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MYLIFELOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
San Ramon, CA
San Ramon, CA
San Ramon, CA
Bush, LA
Bush, LA
Bush, LA
MADISONVILLE, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Nagy
DAVID S. NAGY LAW OFFICES OF DAVID S. NAGY756 S GRIFFITH PARK DRBURBANK, CA 91506-3004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical diagnostic services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kozuch, Michael J.
- Other trademarks owned by Kozuch, Michael J.
- Other trademarks owned by Kozuch, Michael J.
- Other trademarks owned by Fate, Timothy A.
- Other trademarks owned by Fate, Timothy A.
- Other trademarks owned by Fate, Timothy A.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, James E. III
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, James E. III
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, James E. III
- Other trademarks owned by SMITH, JAMES E, III
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MYLIFELOG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |