USPTO serial 77269432
B.M.L. SINCE 1912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3589728Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with B.M.L. SINCE 1912?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
Yokohama, JP
Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
Yokohama, JP
Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
Yokohama, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps and detergents; dentifrices; cosmetics; non-medicated toiletries; oils for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic creams; lotions for cosmetic purposes; natural perfumery prepared from vegetables; natural perfumery prepared from animals; synthetic perfumery; compound perfumery; incenses; fragrances for personal use; room fragrances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Beauty salons; hairdressing salons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Biyo Marie Louise
- Other trademarks owned by Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
- Other trademarks owned by Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
- Other trademarks owned by Wamiles Cosmetics Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Wamiles Cosmetics Inc.)
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named B.M.L. SINCE 1912
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |