Drawing for EOS DIRECTORY

USPTO serial 77269705

EOS DIRECTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EOS DIRECTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miguel Danielson

MIGUEL DANIELSON GOODWIN PROCTER LLP53 STATE STREETATTN: TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Commercial information in the field of software; Providing an online directory information service featuring information regarding software; Providing an on-line computer database featuring trade information in the field of software; Providing consumer information in the field of software; Providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and servicesACTIVEJul 10, 2007
038Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; On-line document delivery via a global computer network; Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning software; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning softwareACTIVEJul 10, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 27, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 26, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance