USPTO serial 77269967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theresa W. Middlebrook
THERESA W. MIDDLEBROOK HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP633 W 5TH ST FL 21LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | bean based snack foods, candied fruit, candied nuts, cereals, cereal based snack foods, dried beans, dried fruit, dried peas, edible nuts and seeds, fruit based snack foods, lentils, nut butters, pea based snack foods, rice based snack foods, seed butters, and wheat based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | baking powder, baking soda, bread crumbs, chocolate and nut butters, cocoa powder, coffee, corn meal, crackers, cracker crumbs, chocolate chips, carob chips, candy, cereals, crackers, dried herbs, drink mixes, dried milk, edible nuts and seeds, fructose, flour, grains, nut butters, nuts, oats, pancake mix, powdered milk, pretzels, processed grains, quinoa, rice, rice noodles, rice paper, soup mixes, snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, dried fruit and/or nuts; spices, soy proteins, sugar, wheat, wheat flour, and yeast | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |