USPTO serial 77270377
AUMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3513769Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AUMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
Jeffrey M. Furr FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Low vision video magnifier consisting of convex lenses or lens systems intended to magnify the appearance of objects; low vision video magnifier in the nature of a loupe, namely, a device that consists of two eyepieces each with a lens or lens system, intended for industrial purposes to magnify the appearance of objects; digital imaging system, namely, a device that provides capabilities relating to the acceptance, transfer, display, storage and digital processing of medical images and comprised of CCD/CMOS camera, digitizers, computers, video monitors, optical disk, digital data storage devices, hardcopy devices and software for performing operations related to image manipulation, enhancement, compression and quantification; lensmeter, namely, a device intended to measure the power of lenses, prisms and their centers; low vision video magnifier, namely, a closed-circuit television reading system consisting of a lens, video camera and video monitor for use by a patient who has subnormal vision to magnify reading material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2006 |
| 010 | Medical equipment in the field of ophthalmology, namely, auto refractometer and keratometer; computerized visual acuity system, namely, a device with a computerized display of a chart on a screen, such as a Snellen chart with block letters or other symbols in graduated sized, intended to test visual acuity and consisting of a compact computer integrated with an LCD monitor, a software for visual acuity testing and a remote control panel; non-contact tonometer, namely, an automatic device intended to measure intraocular pressure by applying a poof of air and a beam of light on the cornea of the eye and measuring the amount of intensity of light reflected from the cornea when it is pressed to flat by air and intended for use in the diagnosis of glaucoma, retinal camera for taking photographs of the eye retina and the surrounding area; vision tester comprised of a set of lenses of various dioptric powers intended to measure the refractive power and error of the eye; PD meter for measuring the distance between the pupils of the two eyes by use of reflected light; ophthalmoscope; retinoscope; slit lamp microscope; operation microscope; electrophysiology system for diagnosing the retina, optic nerve, visual pathways in the clinic, comprised of electrodes, computer software, signal amplifier, monitor, and stimulator; perimeter in the nature of a device which projects light on various points of a curved surface to determine the extent of the peripheral visual field of a patient; optometric instrument table for use during surgery; operating table; trial lens set, namely, a device consisting of a set of lenses of various dioptric powers intended to be handheld or inserted in a trial frame for vision testing to determine refraction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |