USPTO serial 77270804
JUMA IP CONVERGENCE PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUMA IP CONVERGENCE PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Goldbard George
Laura Goldbard George STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 Maiden LaneNEW YORK, NY 10038-4982UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance of telephony systems, wired and wireless communications network infrastructure, information technology platforms and portals, and telecommunications systems; consulting services relating to the installation, maintenance and repair of telephony systems, wired and wireless communications network infrastructure, information technology platforms and portals and telecommunications systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | VoIP (Voice Over IP) telecommunication services for businesses to provide best rate call routing, trunk reduction, toll bypass, session management of real time communication services and provisioning; providing telephony services, namely, providing telephone communication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design, planning, development, engineering, integration, implementation services relating to telephony systems, wired and wireless communications network infrastructure, information technology platforms and portals, telecommunications systems, network infrastructure disaster recovery planning, and computer software in the nature of security, voice, data, video, wired, wireless, and remote systems applications; consulting services relating to network infrastructure disaster recovery planning and computer software in the nature of security, voice, data, video, wired, wireless, and remote systems applications; consulting services relating to the design, development, planning, engineering, implementation and monitoring for technical purposes of telephony systems, wired and wireless communications network infrastructure, information technology platforms and portals and telecommunications systems; application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, telephony applications, software, websites, and databases in the fields of wired and wireless communication, security, mobile information access, and remote data management for wired and wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; maintenance of computer software in the nature of security, voice, data, video, wired, wireless, and remote systems applications; Network monitoring surveillance services, namely, computer network monitoring the system health and availability of communication infrastructure elements such as switches, routers, optical gear, security firewalls, gateways, PBXs, servers and applications that utilize such elements for others for technical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Juma Technology Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Juma Technology Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JUMA IP CONVERGENCE PLAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |