USPTO serial 77271866
NO NASTY CHEMICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO NASTY CHEMICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy D. Bisdorf
JEREMY D. BISDORF JAFFE, RAITT, HEUER & WEISS, P.C.201 S MAIN ST STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104-2176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Housemark for a full line of toiletries, personal cleaning products, household cleaning products and pet cleaning products, namely, Carpet cleaners with deodorizer; Combination cleaner and deodorizer for litter boxes; Denture cleaners; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, gels, toners and peels; Windshield cleaner fluids; Laundry pre-soak; Laundry starch; Almond soaps; Cosmetic soaps; Industrial soap; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Medicated soaps; Waterless soap; Carpet cleaners; Hair balsam; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair color; Hair gels; Hair lotions; Hair mousses; Hair spray; Hair styling gel; Pet odor removers; Pet stain removers; Combination cleaner and deodorizer for litter boxes; Deodorants and antiperspirants; Deodorants for animals; Deodorants for body care; Feminine deodorant sprays; Foot deodorant spray; Personal deodorants; Beauty creams for body care; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body powder; Body sprays; After-shave creams; After-shave gel; Shaving cream; Shaving gels; Make-up remover; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Toothpastes; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Housemark for a full line of house cleaning products, personal cleaning and hygiene products, namely, Air deodorant; Air deodorizer; Household deodorizer; Room deodorants; Deodorizers for household pet litter boxes; Herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointment for pets; Carpet fresheners and odor eliminators; Anti-itch cream; Anti-itch ointment; Anti-insect spray; Antibacterial spray; Feminine hygiene pads; Tampons; Flea collars; Flea powders; Contact lens cleaning solutions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOSTORE USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Investors IV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Investors IV, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NO NASTY CHEMICALS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |