USPTO serial 77272318
B?FRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B?FRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry D. Coleman
William J. Sapone Coleman Sudol Sapone P.C.714 Colorado AvenueBridgeport, CT 06605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby lotion; Baby oil; Baby powder; Body cream; Body lotion; Body oil; Body scrub; Bath foam; Facial scrubs; Facial washes; Skin cream; Skin moisturizer; Skin lightening creams; Sunscreen cream, excluding non-medicated lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |