USPTO serial 77272369
CELEBRITY CHEFS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELEBRITY CHEFS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of an ongoing cooking television program which features sports, music, movie and television celebrities; Entertainment services in the nature of live and pre-recorded performances through stage appearances featuring pre-recorded vocal performances viewed on a big screen and in the nature of pre-recorded performances by sports, music, movie and television celebrities viewed on a big screen; Entertainment services, in the nature of an ongoing television variety program featuring sports, music, movie and television celebrities; Animation production services; Providing information in the field of entertainment, featuring animation rendered by means of a global computer network; Special effects animation services for film and video; Educational services, namely, providing incentives to individuals and organizations to demonstrate excellence in the field of media through the issuance of awards; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs and visual and audio performances in the field of documentary, news shows, cooking shows, comedy, live and pre-recorded musicals and concerts; Educational and variety programming broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment in the nature of theater productions; Dinner theaters; Production of television shows and theatrical production/stage plays; Providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Live, televised and movie appearances by sports, music, movie and television celebrities; Fan clubs; Motion picture film production; Motion picture theaters; Movie studios; Movie theaters; Music production services; Music publishing services; Production and distribution of motion pictures; Production of cable television programs; Production of closed caption television programs; Production of video cassettes; Programming educational and entertainment programs on a global computer network; Radio entertainment production and services, namely radio programs featuring performances by a radio personality, motivational speaker, or sports, music, movie and television celebrities; Record master production; Record production; Recording studios; Production of radio and television programs; Production of video discs for others; Recreational services in the nature of theme parks; Script writing services; Song writing services; Sound recording studios; Television production; Television program syndication; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at discothèques and nightclubs; Cinema studios; Cinema theaters; Distribution of television programs of others to television networks and cable television systems; Awards programs for major corporations and individuals who have made significant charitable contributions; Conducting workshops and seminars in television, radio, and film production | ACTIVE | Sep 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2010 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | RFRC | REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |