USPTO serial 77272848
CABLEMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABLEMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Emu Plains, NSW, AU
Emu Plains, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Sharpe
RICHARD A. SHARPE PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | cable pits of metal; metal drainage pits and drainage conduits; metal lids and covers for drainage pits and drainage conduits; parts for metal cable pits, drainage pits and drainage conduits; accessories for metal cable pits, drainage pits and drainage conduits, namely, metal conduit carriers and metal lifting keys to remove covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ducts for electrical cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | cable pits of concrete and plastic; concrete and plastic drainage pits and drainage conduits; concrete and plastic lids and covers for drainage pits and drainage conduits; parts for concrete and plastic cable pits, drainage pits and drainage conduits; accessories for concrete and plastic cable pits, drainage pits and drainage conduits, namely, non-metal conduit carriers and non-metal lifting keys to remove covers; non-metal ducts not for electrical circuitry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACO Polycrete Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ACO Polycrete Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named CABLEMATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |