USPTO serial 77274534
PEAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Montgomery Smith
MONTGOMERY SMITH TYCO FIRE & BUILDING PRODUCTS1467 ELMWOOD AVENUEGLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTERCRANSTON, RI 02910-3898Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Fire safety equipment, namely, metal pipe and metal pipe fittings, couplings and gaskets; manually operated and automatic metal fire protection valves and sprinklers for use in attics and combustible and non-combustible concealed spaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Fire safety equipment, namely, fire sprinklers; fire alarms; fire flow sensing devices; fire extinguishing and suppression systems and equipment for fire protection, namely, valves, pumps, flow sensors, fire panels and controllers; Fire extinguishing and suppression systems and equipment for fire protection, namely, sprinklers, valves, accelerators, fire panels, piping, couplings, clamps, hangers, mounting hardware, skids, switches and control panels all for use in attics and combustible and non-combustible concealed spaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Fire safety equipment, namely, non-metal pipe, Pipe fittings and flexible pipes, including chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) pipes and fittings all for use in attics and combustible and non-combustible concealed spaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |