USPTO serial 77277259
SMACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hyattsville, MD
Hyattsville, MD
South Riding, VA
South Riding, VA
Beltsville, MD
Beltsville, MD
Beltsville, MD
Beltsville, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Meal replacement bars; Nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute; Vitamin and mineral formed and packaged as bars(Based on Intent to Use) Dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Dietary supplemental drinks; Meal replacement drinks; Powdered fruit-flavored dietary supplement drink mix; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 2007 |
| 032 | (Based on Intent to Use) Energy drinks; Soda pops | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robinson, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Robinson, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Muotoh, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Muotoh, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by 3WAY Enterprises
- Other trademarks owned by 3WAY Enterprises
- Other trademarks owned by Nwaneri, Ikechi
- Other trademarks owned by Nwaneri, Ikechi
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SMACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |