USPTO serial 77279023
DON'T FERTILIZE, REMINERALIZE....WITH VIRGIN SOIL! PUTTING BACK WHAT MOTHER NATURE INTENDED.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DON'T FERTILIZE, REMINERALIZE....WITH VIRGIN SOIL! PUTTING BACK WHAT MOTHER NATURE INTENDED.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Soil erosion control services | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Environmental remediation services, namely, soil treatment services | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Horticultural processes and turf or lawn care services, namely, providing preparation and development of turfgrass and/or soil for providing an environment that encourages improved growth attributes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fertile Soil Products, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fertile Soil Products, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named DON'T FERTILIZE, REMINERALIZE....WITH VIRGIN SOIL! PUTTING BACK WHAT MOTHER NATURE INTENDED.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |