Drawing for MEDIAPLEX

USPTO serial 77281026

MEDIAPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIAPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian M. Hughes

Ian M. Hughes IP Legal Services LLCSuite 1001500 E. Lancaster Ave.Paoli, PA 19301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing intellectual property theater screening facilities, namely, providing theater facilities for screening movies, playing video games on the movie screens, watching broadcast and cable television on the movie screens, watching audio and video broadcasts from a global computer network on the movie screens, watching sporting events on the movie screens, watching concert events on a global computer network on the movie screens, watching educational broadcasts on the movie screens, and listening to music and audible book readings in the theatersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance