Drawing for WATT WATCHERS

USPTO serial 77283579

WATT WATCHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATT WATCHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold B. Silverman

Arnold B. Silverman ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOORU.S. STEEL TOWERPITTSBURGH, PA 15219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Light bulbsACTIVEJan 9, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 11, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 2008LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 23, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 22, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance