USPTO serial 77284495
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEN J. PEDERSEN
Ken J. Pedersen Pedersen & Co., PLLC1410 N 28th StreetBoise, ID 83703-5902UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTIN OF SOUND OR IMAGE; LOUDSPEAKERS, LOUDSPEAKER AND SOUND SYSTEMS; SOUND AMPLIFIERS, SOUND CONTROL APPARATUS; ELECTRO-MECHANICAL ACOUSTIC CONVERTERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; THE BRINGING TOGETHER FOR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS, OF A VARIETY OF GOODS, ENABLING CUSTOMERS TO CONVENIENTLY VIEW AND PURCHASE THOSE GOODS FROM A RETAIL AUDIO SPECIALIST STORE, OR FROM AN AUDIO SPECIALIST CATALOGUE OR INTERNET WEBSITE SPECIALIZING IN THE SALE OF AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND BY MAIL ORDER OR BY MEANS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; CONSULTANCY, ADVISORY AND INFORMATION SERVICES TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | PROVISION OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL ADVICE RELATING TO LOUD SPEAKERS AND AUDIO SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL TESTING SERVICES FOR SOUND SYSTEMS AND LOUD SPEAKER SYSTEMS; RESEARCH AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR LOUD SPEAKERS AND AUDIO SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |