USPTO serial 77284641
TRANSPARENT TARGETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3656052Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRANSPARENT TARGETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer H. Hamilton
Jennifer H. Hamilton The Eclipse Group LLP6345 Balboa Blvd., Suite 325, Bldg. IIEncino, CA 91316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online retail information consolidation accounts, namely, providing information about the goods and services of others via global computer network which is set up using consolidated information accounts for each individual customer; providing online management of commercial transactions relating to consumer resources, specifically electronic and virtual gift cards, loyalty and affinity cards and programs, receipts, rebates, promotions, offers and product registrations; providing data analytics to a targeted and general marketing channel related to the goods and services of others, namely, providing advice on the analysis of consumer buying habits, needs and interest provided with the help of sensory, quality and quantity-related data, including personal and demographic data, integrated tracking of commercial transactions related to the goods and services of others on a global computer network, sale volume tracking for others, gift card purchase and gift card use tracking for others, loyalty program enrollment and benefit use tracking for others, rebate and promotion use tracking for others, and providing consumers with data regarding the consumer's receipt of a particular promotional offer, namely, identifying which data analytics caused the consumer to receive the promotional offer; and providing consumers the ability to control the receipt of promotional offers, namely, controlling from whom a consumer receives promotional offers, the amount of promotional offers received from a particular retailer, the type of promotional offers received, the timing of receipt of particular offers, and the timing of receipt of offers from particular retailers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |