Drawing for HAPPY MAPPY

USPTO serial 77284897

HAPPY MAPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HAPPY MAPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Myers III

Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq. Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree Street, NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Providing a website and website links to geographic information, map images, and trip routing; Providing an interactive computer database in the field of tourism via a global computer networkACTIVENov 30, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance