Drawing for PLUMMER BENNETT GOLF

USPTO serial 77285251

PLUMMER BENNETT GOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLUMMER BENNETT GOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip I. Frankel

Philip I. Frankel BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC1 LINCOLN CTR STE 1800SYRACUSE, NY 13202-1355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DVDs featuring golf instruction; Digital media, namely, DVDs and CDs featuring golf instruction and online downloadable text files, videos and pictures featuring golf instructionACTIVE—
016A series of books and written articles in the field of golf instruction; Books in the field of golf instructionACTIVE—
025Golf shirts; Golf shoes; Golf trousersACTIVE—
041Fitting of golf clubs to individual users; Golf driving range services; Golf instruction; Providing a website through which golfers locate information about golf courses and golf tournaments;Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on DVDs, CDs and online featuring golf instruction; Production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring golf instruction;Training services in the field of golfACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 14, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 28, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2007RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Dec 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance