Drawing for PEPSODENT

USPTO serial 77285812

PEPSODENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEPSODENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Schuman

David J. Schuman CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.469 NORTH HARRISON STREETLAW DEPARTMENTPRINCETON, NJ 08543

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated mouth wash; non-medicated mouth rinseACTIVE—
005Medicated mouth wash, medicated mouth rinse, medicated dental floss; medicated dental tape; dental rinse, dental wax; dental polishACTIVE—
010Dental picksACTIVE—
021Non-medicated dental floss; non-medicated dental tapeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 5, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 7, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 7, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 1, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 1, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance