Drawing for HEALTHY GRO THE TECHNOLOGY OF NATURE

USPTO serial 77285904

HEALTHY GRO THE TECHNOLOGY OF NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3523344Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY GRO THE TECHNOLOGY OF NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Heinisch

Andrew J. Heinisch Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren P.C.2215 Perrygreen WayRockford, IL 61107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Fertilizer for lawns, gardens and golf coursesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 22, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 1, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance