Drawing for COLOR BY DELUXE

USPTO serial 77285990

COLOR BY DELUXE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLOR BY DELUXE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller

SUSAN L. HELLER GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP2450 COLORADO AVENUE, SUITE 400ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films; pre-recorded videotapes featuring motion picture films, television and video programs; pre-recorded DVDs featuring motion picture films, television and video programs; photographic apparatus and cinematographic recording apparatus, transmission, amplification or sound reproduction of images; cinematographic film projectors; video recorders and videotapes; film cleaning apparatus; optical printers; apparatus for editing cinematographic films; film cutting apparatus; exposed films; parts and accessories for all aforesaid articles; cinematographic cameras, digital cameras, video recorders, video disc players, personal video recorders, video-audio adapters, video processing software; broadcast equipment, including, video servers, production switchers, and routers; post production equipment, including, scanners and telecines; software for the rendering of movie pictures in high definition quality; management software for processing and editing video films and other video mediaACTIVEJan 1, 1969

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance