Drawing for COLOR BY DELUXE

USPTO serial 77286146

COLOR BY DELUXE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3621460Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 2009
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with COLOR BY DELUXE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlene M. Krogh

Charlene M. Krogh Dorsey & Whitney LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 400IP DepartmentDenver, CO 80202-5549

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design and development of computer software; research and development, namely, product research and development, research and development of computer software, research and development of data encryption, research and development of digital content security, research and development in the field of digital rights management technology for use in controlling access to digital media, and research and development in the field of motion picture distribution and supply chain distribution; providing videotape to film transfer services, namely, digital transfer services for transferring videos to film; security related services, namely, data encryption services; research and development in connection with the illegal downloading and storing of unauthorized digital motion picture files and anti-piracy developments; research and technology in the field of digital content security, and related services in the nature of development of new products in the field of anti-piracy; hosting the websites of others; website design services for others; electronic content protection services, namely, digital and analog watermarking; custom packaging services, namely, packaging design for others for sound, video, and data recordings; graphic design services for print media in the field of entertainment; DVD menu packaging design for others; design for others of music, video and DVD packaging; quality control for others of the duplication, replication and distribution of digital film and video; DVD menu design for others, namely graphic art design of DVD menus for others; Film to tape transfer services, namely, digital transfer services for transferring film to videotape; Digital transfer services, namely, electronically producing motion picture film from videotape recordings by transferring videos to motion picture film; DVD authoring servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2015C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 14, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance