Drawing for AMOR CALIENTE

USPTO serial 77286607

AMOR CALIENTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMOR CALIENTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, namely, aperitif wine, cooking wine, white wine, red wine, fruit wine, grape wine, honey wine, sweet wine, sparkling fruit wine, sparkling grape wine, natural sparkling wine, table wine; hydromel, mead, sparkling mead excluding tequila, mezcal, distilled alcoholic cocktail mixes, distilled liquor, distilled spirits, liquor, liqueurs, potable spirits, prepared alcoholic cocktails, vodka, wine coolers, wine punch, whiskey, non-alcoholic frozen cocktail drink mixes, namely, margarita mix, daiquiri mix, pina colada mix, bloody mary mix, and alcoholic frozen cocktail drink mixes, namely, margarita mix, daiquiri mix, pina colada mix, bloody mary mixACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 23, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance