USPTO serial 77287429
MEADOW INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEADOW INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony R. Masiello
ANTHONY R. MASIELLO HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products, not including ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk products, not including ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; butter, yoghurts; cheese, cheese spreads, cheese preparations, namely, processed cheese; cheese containing herbs and spices; cheese in powder form, cheese in the form of dips; cheese mixtures, cheese sticks and wedges; cottage cheese, cream cheese; dairy products flavoured with cheese, not including ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; prepared foods made principally of cheese; savouries, namely, appetizers consisting primarily of cheese; cheese-based snack foods; vegetable salads; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, candy and frozen confections; ice creams, custard, edible ices, frozen yoghurts, frozen confectionery; fruit jellies, sherbet, sorbets, dessert puddings; prepared desserts, namely, bakery desserts; ice desserts in the nature of edible ices, ice cream desserts, namely, ice cream sundaes, frozen desserts, namely, ice cream cakes, cheesecakes; cereal snack foods; cereal-based snack foods flavoured with cheese; crackers flavoured with cheese; foodstuffs prepared in the form of savoury snack foods, namely, appetizers consisting primarily of cornmeal; salad dressings; dressing for food, namely, sauces for foods, dressings for salads; mayonnaise, condiments, namely, salt, pepper, flavourings, ketchup, mustard, relish, saffron, tomato sauce, vanilla, vinegar, spices for foodstuffs; desserts, namely, puddings, pastry; chilled desserts, namely, mousses; cream desserts, namely, soufflés; dairy desserts, namely, custards; flavored desserts, namely, flavored ices; milk desserts, namely, desserts consisting of fruit and cream; instant desserts having a milk base; powder mixes for making up into desserts, preparations with a milk base for use as desserts, namely, custard powder, chocolate in powder form; prepared desserts, namely, sweetened gelatin desserts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative Limited
- Other trademarks owned by The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MEADOW INGREDIENT SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |