USPTO serial 77287433
FLYINGDATABASE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3574242Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2009
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLYINGDATABASE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Templeton, CA
Templeton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irving Keschner
IRVING KESCHNER IRVING KESCHNER21535 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 385TORRANCE, CA 90503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic informational newsletters in the field of airports and travel products and services provided via Internet web sites | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2008 |
| 039 | Providing a website on the Internet featuring information about airport runways related to their use, airport services and airport related travel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |