USPTO serial 77287487
DD DD DD DD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DD DD DD DD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
MARIA V. HARDISON TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27TH STREET N.ARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | STATIONERY, PRINTED INVITATIONS, THANK YOU CARDS, NOTE CARDS, WRITING PAPER, GIFT BAGS, PAPER PARTY HATS, PAPER PARTY DECORATIONS AND PAPER SUPPLIES, NAMELY, WRAPPING PAPER, BOWS, PAPER PLACEMATS, PAPER NAPKINS, PAPER PARTY ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, PAPER CHARACTERS AND PAPER BANNERS, AND WALL DECALS; WALL ART AND WALL DECOR IN THE NATURE OF PRINTED, SCREENED OR HAND-PAINTED CANVAS AND OTHER FABRIC STRETCHED OVER FRAMES; PHOTO ALBUMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | PLUSH TOYS FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS, NAMELY, SOFT PLAY BLOCKS AND STACKING RINGS; EDUCATIONAL AND DECORATIVE TOYS, NAMELY, EDUCATIONAL BLOCKS AND SOFT PUZZLES; RATTLES; DECORATIVE CRIB MOBILES, TOY CRIB MOBILES, TOYS, NAMELY, SOFT TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; INFANT EXERCISE SEATS, NAMELY, JUMPERS AND INFANT SAUCERS, AND TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY, ACTIVITY TOY FOR BABIES AND INFANTS, CONSISTING OF AN ACTIVITY BLANKET, FLEXIBLE ARCHES, TOY MOBILES, PLASTIC TOY ANIMALS, TEETHING TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, SQUEAKER TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, AND PLASTIC HOOKS ALL SOLD AS A UNIT; PLASTIC PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS; STREAMERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dwell Home Furnishings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Dwell Home Furnishings LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DD DD DD DD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |