USPTO serial 77288406
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Inver Grove Heights, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD PC80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREETSUITE 3200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2215CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |