USPTO serial 77288584
GP THUNDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4075609Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2011
- Examiner
- KUMIS, SCOTT N
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GP THUNDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eastvale, GA, US
Eastvale, GA, US
Lawrenceville, GA, US
Eastvale, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATHAN CAMUTI
NATHAN CAMUTI CAMUTI LAW GROUP APC33 BROOKLINEALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Automobile light bulbs | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chang, Sheng-yi
- Other trademarks owned by Chang, Sheng-yi
- Other trademarks owned by MARC, WEI BING
- Other trademarks owned by Chang, Sheng-yi
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named GP THUNDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |