USPTO serial 77288708
PUSSY JUICE IT'S THE ONLY JUICE TO DRINK.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUSSY JUICE IT'S THE ONLY JUICE TO DRINK.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Venice, CA
Venice, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sepehr Daghighian, Esq.
SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, ESQ. LAW OFFICES OF SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, P.C.433 N CAMDEN DR FL 4BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Vegetable juices; Herbal juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kopatz, Eric W.
- Other trademarks owned by Kopatz, Eric W.
- Other trademarks owned by Fielding, David Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Fielding, David Charles
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PUSSY JUICE IT'S THE ONLY JUICE TO DRINK.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |