USPTO serial 77288797
MINESENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINESENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10017-4046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer-based and instrument-based monitoring in the mining industry using sensor based detection systems for the detection and analysis of chemistry, content, and physical condition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |