USPTO serial 77289217
MYWAY BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYWAY BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Purcell
ROBERT E. PURCELL HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP100 CHESTNUT ST STE 2000ROCHESTER, NY 14604-2404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | on-line banking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |