Drawing for GREEN-KEY

USPTO serial 77289355

GREEN-KEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN-KEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene S. Winter

Gene S. Winter ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPERBOARD KEYCARDS MADE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY MATERIALSACTIVENov 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 14, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 14, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 6, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 6, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 5, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance