USPTO serial 77289759
ONEQUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEQUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett M. Tolpin
Brett M. Tolpin Tolpin Law Office283 Leslee LaneHighland Park, IL 60035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable Internet based computer software for use in creating advertising that is targeted towards various consumer groups based upon behavioral attributes of the targeted groups and the contextual content of the media and for use in placing and delivering advertising media over a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing non-downloadable Internet based computer software for use in targeting advertising towards various consumer groups based upon behavioral attributes of the targeted group and the contextual content of the media and for use in placing and delivering advertising media over aglobal computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |