Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77290085?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77290085. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns GOURMET CHOICE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77290085, the listed owner(s) include: Del Monte Corporation.

What is USPTO serial number 77290085?

Serial number 77290085 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark GOURMET CHOICE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of GOURMET CHOICE?

GOURMET CHOICE (77290085) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover GOURMET CHOICE?

The public record lists International Classes: 029. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77290085

GOURMET CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 27, 2007
Status date: Aug 25, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: KEAM, ALEX S
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOURMET CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Del Monte Corporation
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Del Monte Corporation

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack, Esquire

David V. Radack Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	Seafood	ACTIVE	Dec 31, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 2, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 25, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 4, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 4, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 28, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 28, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Sep 1, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 25, 2009	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 25, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 11, 2009	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Apr 23, 2009	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 23, 2009	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 23, 2009	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Feb 24, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 23, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 23, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 22, 2008	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 17, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jun 25, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 25, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 3, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 3, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 2, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—