Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77290620?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77290620. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns STORY ORBIT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77290620, the listed owner(s) include: Turtle Pond Publications LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 77290620?

Serial number 77290620 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark STORY ORBIT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover STORY ORBIT?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77290620

STORY ORBIT

Q: What is the current status of STORY ORBIT?

STORY ORBIT (77290620) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 27, 2007
Status date: Mar 12, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STORY ORBIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Turtle Pond Publications LLC
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Turtle Pond Publications LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire, Esq.

HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	online electronic publishing of a children's interactive magazine (webzine) featuring activities and stories	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 14, 2011	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 12, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 12, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 26, 2011	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Oct 29, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Oct 29, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 29, 2010	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Apr 29, 2010	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Apr 29, 2010	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Apr 20, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 19, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 19, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2010	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Apr 19, 2010	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Feb 18, 2010	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2010	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2009	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Aug 3, 2009	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Aug 3, 2009	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Jul 27, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 27, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 27, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 24, 2009	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
Jul 16, 2009	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Jul 13, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2009	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 11, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 28, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 28, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2008	GRML	CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED	—
Jul 23, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 23, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 23, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 23, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
May 28, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
May 28, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 28, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 19, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 19, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 19, 2007	GPRN	NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 19, 2007	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 19, 2007	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 14, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 2, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—