Drawing for VMNAS

USPTO serial 77290757

VMNAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VMNAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Alleman

Mark D. Alleman ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical consulting and research services in the fields of computer software, computer hardware, and computer networks; computer programming services; design, development, deployment, implementation, analysis, integration, and management of computer software for others; installation, modification, maintenance, and repair of computer software; customization and configuration of computer software and hardware; consulting services related to virtual infrastructure, storage and networking; managed information technology services and operations for others, namely, management of virtual infrastructure, networking and storage services; service provider, namely, hosting, managing and administering computer software for others; leasing and rental of computer software; technical support services, namely, trouble shooting of computer software and computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance