Drawing for JUSTLIFE.ORG

USPTO serial 77290944

JUSTLIFE.ORG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSTLIFE.ORG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP2900 K Street NW - North Tower Ste. 200Washington, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed brochures, books, pamphlets, journals, newsletters, and magazines pertaining to social networking, access to information, forums and other advocacy efforts for those with disabilities and for people affected by those with disabilities; posters, prints, calendars, greeting cardsACTIVE—
042Providing a website that gives computer users the ability to upload, exchange and share photos, and videos on relevant issues for those with disabilities and for people affected by those with disabilitiesACTIVE—
045Social networking and online network site providing advice on socializing, social networking, and information on socializing for those with disabilities and for people affected by those with disabilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance