USPTO serial 77291219
IDEA SUPERHIGHWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEA SUPERHIGHWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wellesley Hills, MA
Wellesley Hills, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital materials, namely, CDs, DVDs, and downloadable audio files, featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products and services; Prerecorded audio cassettes featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Audio and video recordings featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Downloadable multimedia files containing artwork, text, audio, video, games, and internet web links relating to starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books, written articles, handouts and worksheets in the field of educating and advising businesses and entrepreneurs in starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Brochures about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, businesses, and products; Circulars in the field of educating and advising businesses and entrepreneurs in starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Magazines featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Newsletters featuring information about starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials in the field of starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services; Publications, namely, brochures, booklets, and teaching materials in the field of educating and advising businesses and entrepreneurs in starting and developing businesses and developing, marketing, and protecting ideas, products, and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lindsey, Charles C.
- Other trademarks owned by Lindsey, Charles C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named IDEA SUPERHIGHWAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |