USPTO serial 77291240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Barricella
SUSAN J. BARRICELLA RUTAN & TUCKER LLP611 ANTON BLVD FL 14COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7681UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the sale of goods and services of others by awarding incentives to consumers for credit card use | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial services, namely, charge, credit card and debit card services; bill payment processing services; computerized credit authorization and financial risk management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | providing advice to travelers on hotels, restaurants and events; making reservations for travel, hotels, restaurants and events for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | concierge services for others, namely, making requested personal, social and business arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet the individual needs of customer card holders and travelers; personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal, social and business arrangements and reservations, personal shopping services; personal gift selection and gift reminder services for others; and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs, all rendered in business establishments, office buildings, airports, hotels, residential complexes and homes; fraud detection services in the field of credit card usage | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |