USPTO serial 77292565
ACTIVECONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4100500Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2012
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTIVECONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, CA
Burlington, CA
Burlington, CA
BURLINGTON, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
Matthew R. Mowers BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIPS WHICH ARE USED TO PROVIDE A HIGH QUALITY LINK BETWEEN MULTIMEDIA A/V DEVICES SUCH AS TELEVISIONS, DVD PLAYERS, CAMERAS, COMPUTER MONITORS, COMMERCIAL AND HOME THEATRE PROJECTORS AND PROJECTION SCREENS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENNUM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GENNUM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GENNUM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SEMTECH CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ACTIVECONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |